<< back to Guides

🧩 Guide to Database Models: From Flat Files to Star Schemas

A Database Model defines how data is structured, stored, and related within a database system. Choosing the right model depends on the system’s complexity, access patterns, performance, and consistency needs.

This guide covers the most widely used database models with examples and trade-offs.

📄 1. Flat File Model

🧠 Concept

The simplest model — all data is stored in a single table or file, often in CSV or TSV format.

✅ Use Cases

Simple configurations or exports
Logging systems
Legacy systems

// Example CSV
UserId,Name,Age
1,Alice,30
2,Bob,25

⚠️ Limitations

No relationships between records
Not scalable or efficient for large, complex datasets

🌲 2. Hierarchical Model

🧠 Concept

Data is organized in a tree-like structure, with parent-child relationships (like XML).

// Pseudocode structure
Company
 ├── Department
 │    ├── Employee
 │    └── Employee
 └── Department
      └── Employee

✅ Use Cases

XML/JSON storage
Mainframes (IBM IMS)
File systems

⚠️ Limitations

Rigid hierarchy
Hard to model many-to-many relationships

🔗 3. Network Model

🧠 Concept

Like the hierarchical model, but supports many-to-many relationships via graph-like links.

// Simplified example
Employee {
  ID: 1
  WorksOn: [Project1, Project2]
}

✅ Use Cases

Telecommunications
Complex data structures in legacy systems

⚠️ Limitations

Complex to design and query
Largely replaced by relational and graph models

🧱 4. Relational Model

🧠 Concept

Data is stored in tables (relations). Relationships are managed via foreign keys.

// SQL table example
CREATE TABLE Orders (
  OrderID INT PRIMARY KEY,
  UserID INT,
  Amount DECIMAL,
  FOREIGN KEY (UserID) REFERENCES Users(UserID)
);

✅ Use Cases

Transactional systems
Enterprise business apps
Any domain requiring ACID compliance

⚖️ Trade-offs

Pros	Cons
Strong data integrity	Harder to scale horizontally
SQL is powerful	Complex joins impact performance

⭐ 5. Star Schema (Dimensional Model)

🧠 Concept

Used in data warehousing, a central fact table connects to denormalized dimension tables.

// Star schema layout
FactSales
 ├── DateID
 ├── ProductID
 ├── StoreID

DimensionDate
DimensionProduct
DimensionStore

✅ Use Cases

OLAP systems
BI dashboards
High-speed analytical queries

⚖️ Trade-offs

Pros	Cons
Fast read performance	Redundant data (denormalized)
Simpler to query	Less normalized = update cost

❄️ 6. Snowflake Schema

🧠 Concept

Like a star schema, but dimension tables are normalized (split into sub-tables).

// Snowflake schema layout
FactSales
 ├── ProductID

DimensionProduct
 └── ProductCategory
      └── ProductDepartment

✅ Use Cases

Data warehouses with complex hierarchies
When storage efficiency is prioritized

⚖️ Trade-offs

Pros	Cons
More normalized	More complex queries
Space efficient	Requires joins

🧮 7. Object-Oriented Model

🧠 Concept

Combines database concepts with object-oriented programming. Objects contain data and methods.

// Example object
class User {
  int id;
  String name;
  Address address;
}

✅ Use Cases

Applications with complex data types
Object databases (ObjectDB, db4o)

🧠 8. Document Model (NoSQL)

🧠 Concept

Stores data as JSON-like documents, which can be deeply nested.

// MongoDB document
{
  "userId": "123",
  "name": "Alice",
  "orders": [
    { "orderId": "a1", "amount": 50 },
    { "orderId": "a2", "amount": 100 }
  ]
}

✅ Use Cases

Flexible schema
Content management systems
Real-time apps

🕸️ 9. Graph Model

🧠 Concept

Data is stored as nodes and edges, ideal for traversing relationships.

// Graph elements
(User)-[FRIENDS_WITH]->(AnotherUser)

✅ Use Cases

Social networks
Fraud detection
Recommendation systems

Examples: Neo4j, Amazon Neptune

📦 Comparison Summary

Model	Use Case	Strengths	Weaknesses
Flat	Logs, configs	Simplicity	No relationships
Hierarchical	XML data, filesystems	Tree-like queries	Rigid
Network	Legacy complex systems	Many-to-many	Complex navigation
Relational	Transactions, business apps	ACID, mature SQL support	Scaling joins is difficult
Star	Data warehousing	Fast reads, easy queries	Denormalized
Snowflake	Data warehouses (normalized)	Storage-efficient	Complex joins
Object-Oriented	OOP apps	Aligns with code models	Less adoption
Document	CMS, NoSQL apps	Flexible, nested structures	Limited query capabilities
Graph	Networked data	Relationship traversal is fast	Less suited for tabular data

📘 Resources

<< back to Guides