Read the Tempo

Often, the factor that determines whether an idea succeeds or fails isn’t whether it’s good or bad, but when and how it’s implemented. Great ideas fail every day—not because they’re wrong, but because they come at the wrong time. The difference between moving forward or stumbling lies in reading the tempo and understanding trade-offs: every decision has a cost, and choosing well means taking full ownership of the consequences.

Strategy is the art of analyzing the past and the present to project possible futures and make decisions accordingly. As engineers, we constantly face decisions with benefits and costs. Understanding those trade-offs and evaluating their impact beforehand is what turns risky moves into conscious choices.

Refactoring

This is one of the fundamental practices in software development. Refactoring improves maintainability, optimizes systems, and enables evolution. But it can also introduce negative side effects—especially when large in scope—such as unpredictable delivery delays or unexpected bugs.

As a general rule, avoid refactoring while introducing a new feature. If you must do both, tackle the refactor first as a separate task. And whenever possible, work by extending rather than modifying: it’s easier to revert or shift direction when things don’t go as expected.

Introducing New Technologies

Innovation is essential—from using a new library to adopting a new database engine. But just like with refactoring, this introduces friction. The learning curve, tooling adjustments, and mindset shifts all come with a cost. Sometimes the cost is invisible at first but shows up later—often when you're under pressure to deliver.

When you bring a new technology into a project, you’re also introducing it to your team. And that always demands adaptation.

Team Changes

This often falls outside the direct control of developers, but has clear strategic consequences.

Adding people mid-project. Even though we all know “adding people to a late project makes it later,” it’s still a tempting idea. If the new person lacks context, it slows the team down due to onboarding overhead. Adding someone at the start of a project can make sense. Midway through, it’s a coin toss. Near the end? It’s almost always a mistake.

Removing people. Even if someone isn’t performing well, pulling them from a project in progress is risky. Unless there’s a clear and better replacement, it disrupts load balancing, erodes accumulated knowledge, and damages morale.

Technical work is also strategic work. It’s not just about knowing what to do, but when to do it. That means learning to read the tempo, understanding trade-offs, and acting with intent.
The best decisions aren’t the most brilliant—they’re the ones made at the right time.

exit(0);